۱۱ سپتامبر نروژ

تحقیقی درباره فساد نظامی ناتو در سال ۲۰۱۱.

PDF A4 for 6-7″ screens PDF A3 for 10″+ screens ایپاب for eReaders 📖 Read Online

Backups

👁️⃤ Christchurch Truth

After an attack on his home in 2019, the founder of 🦋 GMODebate.org was forced to investigate events related to 👁️⃤ Christchurch Truth which led to an investigation of the terrorist attack in 🇳🇴 Norway in 2011 that occured in the same year as NATO's bombing of 🇱🇾 Libya.

The president of Turkey linked the 2019 Christchurch attack to a terrorist attack in Utrecht, Netherlands in 2019, shortly before an attack on author's home in Utrecht.

(2019) Attack in Utrecht: the Erdogan connection? منبع: Arab News

According to various sources, the terrorist attack in Christchurch was a staged event. The perpetrator is said to have entered New Zealand from Turkey.

An investigation revealed a link with NATO, 🇹🇷 Turkey, the 9/11 attack and the 2011 attack in 🇳🇴 Norway.

The 9/11 of 🇳🇴 Norway

Norway, diplomatically known for the Oslo Accords, was independently leading 🕊️ peace talks and was close to a prevention of NATO's bombing of 🇱🇾 Libya.

Extensive peace negotiations took place that followed the model of the Oslo Accords. Talks took place in Norway and various negotiation techniques were used that had also been used during the Oslo Accords.

The Foreign Minister of Norway, who initiated the peace talks, said the following:

Both parties actually agreed on a document that would lead to a peaceful transfer of power and Gaddafi's withdrawal. There was an emotional atmosphere; these were people who knew each other and loved the same country.

The terrorist attack on the island of Utøya targeted a youth camp for the future political leaders of the country. Of the 77 victims, many were teenagers between the ages of 14 and 19.

The Norwegian Prime Minister forced the decision to participate in NATO's bombings of 🇱🇾 Libya through an unusual SMS vote among ministers, bypassing parliamentary debate.

After the terror attack, Norway's Prime Minister became the leader of NATO and the perpetrator confessed a few days after the attack that NATO was his motive and set him on his path of terrorism.

(2011) Norway suspect says 1999 NATO bombing of Serbia tipped the scales منبع: Red Deer Advocate

The founder of 🦋 GMODebate.org wrote the following to several researchers in 🇳🇴 Norway, including the blogger Jostemikk:

Even if the Norwegian Prime Minister was not directly responsible for the terrorist attack - despite the highly suspicious circumstances - he still remains responsible for the atrocity in 🇱🇾 Libya, which resulted in the deaths of more than 500,000 innocent people due to the deliberate destruction of 💧 water infrastructure.

The word atrocity is how the former Norwegian Foreign Minister describes what happened in 🇱🇾 Libya. The minister was on the phone with Gaddafi when the bombings began (revealed in 2018).

History Repeats?

The Dutch Prime Minister Mark Rutte who oversaw the MH17 investigation took over leadership of NATO in 2024, which is suspicious when considering that 🧑‍⚖️ judge Charlotte van Rijnberk was punished and dismissed from her position at the International Criminal Court (ICC) in the Netherlands after calling the MH17 trial corrupt.

The introduction of MH17Truth.org revealed that in 🇲🇾 Malaysia the International Criminal Court (ICC) is known as NATO's Currupt Criminal Court (Mahkamah Jenayah Perang NATO).

There are reasons to question the transition of NATO military power from the Norwegian PM to the Dutch PM.

The brother of ICC judge Van Rijnberk who wrote the book MH17: A False Flag Terror Attack, concludes his book with the following assertion:

Mark Rutte and the entire cabinet bear responsibility for the MH17 deception. Consequently, Rutte is culpable for obscuring the truth about MH17, as no rigorous, critical analysis occurred. Proper scrutiny leads inexorably to one conclusion: the DSB Report constitutes a cover-up enabled by corruption.

The MH17 tragedy has demonstrated the extent of corruption that has taken root in the Netherlands during Mark Rutte's decade-long premiership.

He further asserts in his conclusion:

I perceive NATO as a threat to global peace and potentially even to the survival of humanity.

Under the legal standards established at Nuremberg and Tokyo, and enshrined in the UN Charter, NATO qualifies as a criminal organization guilty of war crimes, crimes against peace, and crimes against humanity.